Development

Construction Procurement & Contracts Engine

GC selection, bid leveling, GMP/lump sum negotiation, CO compliance, punch list management, and design team evaluation for Development Managers.

GC selectionbid levelingGMP negotiation

Download the CRE Skills Plugin

Latest release, portable bundle (signed). Review the SKILL.md files before installing into your agent.

dataNo personal data
What it does

Takes in GC bids, contract terms, draw requests, change orders, or punch list data and returns normalized bid comparisons, contract redlines, draw compliance checklists, CO adjudications, or warranty-tracked closeout packages.

Why it matters

Development managers juggle five distinct procurement phases, each with its own math and its own way to lose money. A bid that looks $2M cheaper often has $1.8M in excluded scope. A GMP amendment without a dollar threshold is no GMP at all. A draw approved without complete lien waivers can cloud title. The errors are predictable but the standard process has no systematic check at any of these gates.

How it's done today

A development manager reads each bid narrative and manually builds a scope matrix in a spreadsheet. Contract redlines are drafted from memory or last cycle's AIA markup. Draw reviews are a stack of pay apps on the PM's desk. Change orders get eyeballed against a gut feel for labor and material rates. Punch lists live in email chains. None of it is reproducible and institutional knowledge walks out the door when the PM does.

When to use it

Reach for it

Use it at any of the five procurement workflow steps: leveling two or more GC bids, negotiating or reviewing a GMP or lump sum contract, reviewing a monthly construction loan draw, adjudicating a change order, or managing punch list and project closeout.

Not the right tool

Not a substitute for a cost estimator when you have no bids to level. For pre-procurement budget validation and hard cost feasibility, run construction-budget-gc-analyzer first. After the contract is signed and the project is tracking, construction-project-command-center handles ongoing schedule and cost monitoring.

What it needs and produces

Inputs

  • OM
Example use case

Three GCs bid a 250-unit wood-frame multifamily at $43.8M, $41.2M, and $46.5M. The skill normalizes scope, adds back $455K in exclusions from the apparent low bidder, and produces a leveled comparison at $43.8M, $41.6M, and $45.9M per SF. The low bidder's general conditions are thin for a 20-month schedule, raising a staffing risk flag. The recommendation is to negotiate a GMP with the middle-scoring GC, targeting a $43.5M GMP with 60/40 shared savings.

Compatible agents

Agent personas that pair well with this skill

Works with
Limitations

Markup reasonableness checks reference RS Means benchmarks and AIA standard forms, but they do not replace a licensed cost estimator or construction attorney. CO entitlement determinations and contract interpretation require legal review before binding decisions. The skill flags retainage, lien waiver, and bonding issues but does not provide legal sign-off on draw releases or contract execution.