Daily Operations

Insurance & Risk Manager

Insurance program review, coverage adequacy testing, contractor insurance verification, builder's risk/OCIP/CCIP evaluation, and property tax escrow management for AM, PM, and Development.

insurance renewalcoverage adequacybuilder's risk

Download the CRE Skills Plugin

Latest release, portable bundle (signed). Review the SKILL.md files before installing into your agent.

dataNo personal data
What it does

Takes portfolio asset data, current policy terms, and construction parameters and returns a coverage gap matrix, coinsurance compliance check, COI deficiency log, and renewal action plan by workflow step.

Why it matters

Coverage gaps in CRE are invisible until a claim. Coinsurance clauses punish owners whose insured values lag construction cost inflation. Contractor COIs expire mid-project with no one tracking them. Most mid-size owner-operators lack a dedicated risk manager, so insurance lives in a broker email chain and a stale spreadsheet.

How it's done today

An asset manager reviews policies at renewal, usually 30-60 days out, with limited time to push back. COIs get collected from contractors and filed without field-by-field verification. Replacement cost values are carried forward from the prior year. Builder's risk transitions to permanent coverage happen informally, with gaps no one notices until a loss occurs.

When to use it

Reach for it

Use it at annual renewal (starting 120 days out), when onboarding a new asset, at construction start for contractor COI setup, when placing or evaluating a builder's risk or OCIP/CCIP program, and at each quarterly property tax escrow reconciliation.

Not the right tool

Not a substitute for your broker's submission to the market or a licensed adjuster's claim settlement. For a contested property tax assessment, route to property-tax-appeal-analyzer. For lease-required COI tracking on operating properties, pair with coi-compliance-checker.

Example use case

A 280-unit multifamily acquired in 2021 has not had replacement cost values updated since closing. Running coverage adequacy testing shows the property is insured at $38M against a current MVS replacement cost estimate of $51M, creating a coinsurance penalty exposure of roughly $2.2M on a $10M loss under a 90% clause. The output flags the gap, quantifies the penalty, and produces a statement of values update for the broker with a recommended agreed amount endorsement.

Compatible agents

Agent personas that pair well with this skill

Works with
Limitations

Outputs are reviewed analysis, not a bound policy or legal opinion. Carrier acceptance of recommended terms depends on market conditions and underwriting decisions that a skill cannot control. The coinsurance penalty calculation uses the inputs you provide; if replacement cost data is stale, the exposure estimate will be too.