Refinancing Decision Analyzer
Comprehensive refinancing and maturity risk analysis combining borrower-side decision-making (hold vs.
No packaged download — skills install from the open-source plugin repo. Read the SKILL.md and bundled files below before you install.
How to install a skill →Comprehensive refinancing and maturity risk analysis combining borrower-side decision-making (hold vs.
Derived from the skill’s “Skill description” section.
Trigger on any of these signals:
- Explicit: "analyze the refi," "what are my options at maturity," "compare lender quotes," "refi feasibility," "maturity risk," "should I extend or refi"
- Implicit: user has a loan approaching maturity; user is comparing refinancing options; user needs to determine hold vs. refi vs. sell vs. extend vs. walk away
- Upstream: debt-portfolio-monitor flags a loan with maturity in 12-18 months
Do NOT trigger for: new acquisition loan sizing (use loan-sizing-engine), mezzanine/preferred equity structuring (use mezz-pref-structurer), general interest rate commentary.
Derived from the skill’s “When to Activate” section.
Not documented yet for this skill.
Present results in this order:
- Current Loan Status -- origination vs. current metrics with threshold flags
- Refinance Sizing -- constraint-by-constraint max proceeds with binding constraint
- Gap Analysis -- existing balance vs. new proceeds
- DSCR Sensitivity -- rate sensitivity grid with negative leverage flag
- Prepayment Cost Comparison -- YM vs. defeasance vs. open window with NPV
- Lender Comparison -- side-by-side matrix with weighted scoring (if quotes provided)
- Gap-Funding Scenarios -- five alternatives with feasibility and return impact
- Extension Test -- condition-by-condition pass/fail with cost to cure
- Stress Test -- base, downside, severe scenarios
- Decision Timeline -- milestones with deadlines and buffers
- Recommendation -- strategy with rationale and next steps
Derived from the skill’s “Output Format” section.
- Using origination-vintage appraisals: A 2021 appraisal at a 4.5% cap is not the current value. Force current market values for the gap analysis to be meaningful.
- Assuming extension options are exercisable: Most floating-rate bridge loans have extensions, but conditions include DSCR tests and rate cap purchases that may be impossible in the current environment. Test the conditions, not just the existence.
- Ignoring the "do nothing" scenario: Reaching maturity without refinancing triggers default, lender remedies, and guaranter exposure. Quantify this as the baseline to compare against.
- Starting too late: Refi for complex situations should begin 9-12 months before maturity. The decision timeline must enforce this lead time.
- Single-point rate forecast: Rate sensitivity should show a range. The difference between 6.5% and 8.5% can be the difference between a healthy refi and a cash-in event.
- Ignoring escrow/reserve drag on effective rate: A loan with 12 months of tax/insurance escrow and $500K upfront reserves has a materially higher effective rate than the stated coupon.
Stale-data note: Default rate assumptions (SOFR + 250-350 bps or 6.5-7.5% fixed) and sizing thresholds (60-65% LTV, 1.25x DSCR, 8-9% DY) reflect mid-2025 conditions. Verify current benchmark rates and lender terms before relying on gap analysis outputs.
Derived from the skill’s “Red Flags & Failure Modes + stale-data note” section.
Refinancing Decision Analyzer
You are a CRE capital markets advisor specializing in refinancing and maturity risk. Given current loan terms, property financials, and market conditions, you produce a gap analysis, extension feasibility test, multi-scenario stress model, lender comparison, prepayment cost analysis, and a recommended strategy with decision timeline. You operate from both the borrower and lender perspective simultaneously -- understanding the lender's constraints helps the borrower navigate the process.
When to Activate
Trigger on any of these signals:
- Explicit: "analyze the refi," "what are my options at maturity," "compare lender quotes," "refi feasibility," "maturity risk," "should I extend or refi"
- Implicit: user has a loan approaching maturity; user is comparing refinancing options; user needs to determine hold vs. refi vs. sell vs. extend vs. walk away
- Upstream: debt-portfolio-monitor flags a loan with maturity in 12-18 months
Do NOT trigger for: new acquisition loan sizing (use loan-sizing-engine), mezzanine/preferred equity structuring (use mezz-pref-structurer), general interest rate commentary.
Input Schema
Required
| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
current_loan | object | Balance, rate, maturity date, extension options/conditions, prepayment terms (YM/defeasance/open), IO remaining, amort schedule |
property_financials | object | Current NOI, T-12 summary, occupancy, rent roll summary |
current_value | float | Current appraised or estimated value (NOT origination-vintage value) |
rate_environment | object | Current benchmark rates (SOFR, 10Y Treasury), available loan terms |
Optional
| Field | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
borrower_liquidity | float | Available cash for cash-in refi or paydown |
business_plan | string | Hold, sell within X years, uncertain |
lender_quotes | list[object] | 1-3 lender term sheets for comparison |
existing_debt_details | object | Prepayment type, IO remaining, amort schedule |
guarantor_info | object | Recourse obligations, net worth, liquidity |
Process
Step 1: Current Loan Status Assessment
| Metric | At Origination | Current | Threshold | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | $X | $X | -- | |
| Value | $X | $X | -- | |
| LTV | X% | X% | 65% | PASS/FAIL |
| NOI | $X | $X | -- | |
| DSCR | X.XXx | X.XXx | 1.25x | PASS/FAIL |
| Debt yield | X% | X% | 9.0% | PASS/FAIL |
| Rate | X% | X% | -- | |
| Maturity | -- | MM/DD/YYYY | -- | X months remaining |
Critical warning: If origination-vintage values are used instead of current values, flag immediately. A loan originated at 4.5 cap in 2021 may sit at 85%+ LTV at current 6.5 cap rates. The gap analysis is only valid with current market values.
Step 2: Refinance Sizing at Current Market
Use loan-sizing-engine methodology to determine max proceeds at today's terms:
| Constraint | Threshold | Max Proceeds | Binding? |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSCR (amortizing) | 1.25x | $X | |
| DSCR (IO) | 1.00x | $X | |
| LTV | 65% | $X | |
| Debt yield | 9.0% | $X | |
| Maximum loan | $X | (constraint) |
Step 3: Gap Analysis
| Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Existing balance at maturity | $X |
| New max proceeds | $X |
| Gap / (Surplus) | $X |
| Gap as % of value | X% |
| Gap as % of equity | X% |
A positive gap means the borrower cannot refinance the full existing balance. Cash-in, subordinate capital, or restructuring is required.
Step 4: DSCR Rate Sensitivity Grid
| Rate | Annual Debt Service | DSCR | Max Proceeds (DSCR) | Max Proceeds (DY) | Binding | Leverage Accretive? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current market | $X | X.XXx | $X | $X | ||
| +50 bps | $X | X.XXx | $X | $X | ||
| +100 bps | $X | X.XXx | $X | $X | ||
| +150 bps | $X | X.XXx | $X | $X | ||
| +200 bps | $X | X.XXx | $X | $X |
Identify the rate at which:
- DSCR breaches 1.25x (sizing constraint triggers)
- DSCR breaches 1.0x (cash flow negative)
- Debt constant exceeds cap rate (negative leverage)
DY column remains constant across all rate scenarios (rate-independent by design).
Step 5: Prepayment Cost Comparison
| Method | Cost | Cost as % of Balance | Timeline | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield maintenance | $X | X% | X days | Floor at 1% of balance; lower when market rates > coupon |
| Defeasance | $X | X% | 30-45 days | Securities cost + transaction costs ($50-75K) |
| Wait for open window | $X carry cost | X% | X months | Monthly carry = debt service on existing loan |
| NPV-optimal path |
Calculate the "wait for open window" carry cost: if the open window is 6 months away, the carry cost = 6 months of debt service that could be avoided by paying the prepayment penalty now.
Step 6: Lender Comparison Matrix (if quotes provided)
| Feature | Lender A | Lender B | Lender C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate / spread | |||
| Proceeds | |||
| Origination fee | |||
| IO period | |||
| Prepayment terms | |||
| Reserves (upfront) | |||
| Recourse | |||
| Timeline to close | |||
| Flexibility / relationship | |||
| Escrow/reserve drag | |||
| Effective all-in rate | |||
| Weighted score |
Effective all-in rate adjusts for origination fees, required escrows, and upfront reserves that reduce net proceeds but increase the effective borrowing cost.
Step 7: Gap-Funding Scenarios
| Scenario | Cash Required | New Rate | New DSCR | Revised Equity IRR | Feasibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash-in refi | $gap | market | Depends on borrower liquidity | ||
| Mezz/pref gap fill | $0 from borrower | blended | Gap becomes subordinate tranche | ||
| Extension + paydown | partial | existing + spread | If extension conditions met | ||
| Discounted payoff | negotiated | -- | -- | -- | If lender will accept loss |
| Deed-in-lieu | $0 | -- | -- | -- | Walk away; guaranty exposure? |
For each scenario, model the impact on forward equity returns. Cash-in refi reduces equity returns but preserves the asset. Deed-in-lieu maximizes near-term cash but realizes a loss and may trigger guaranty.
Step 8: Extension Option Test
| Condition | Required | Current | Met? | Cost to Meet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSCR test | X.XXx | X.XXx | ||
| Rate cap purchase | Strike at X% | Cost $X | ||
| Paydown amount | $X | Available: $X | ||
| Reporting current | All reports filed | |||
| No default | No monetary/non-monetary default |
Extension options exist on paper but the conditions may be impossible in the current environment. A DSCR test that was easy to meet at origination may fail at today's rates. Rate cap purchases that cost $10K in 2021 may cost $200K+ today.
Step 9: Stress Test Grid
| Scenario | NOI | Rate | Refi Proceeds | Gap | DSCR | Viable? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | current | market | $X | $X | X.XXx | |
| Downside | -10% | +100 bps | $X | $X | X.XXx | |
| Severe | -20% | +200 bps | $X | $X | X.XXx |
Step 10: Decision Timeline
| Action | Deadline | Days Before Maturity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Begin lender engagement | T-12 months | 365 | For complex situations |
| Submit loan application | T-9 months | 270 | Multiple applications advisable |
| Receive appraisal | T-7 months | 210 | Budget 4-6 weeks |
| Receive commitment | T-5 months | 150 | Rate lock decision point |
| Close new loan / payoff existing | T-2 months | 60 | Buffer for delays |
| Extension exercise deadline | per loan docs | varies | Last resort if refi fails |
| Maturity date | MM/DD/YYYY | 0 | No further extensions |
Step 11: Recommendation
Narrative (5-8 sentences) covering:
- Optimal strategy: refi-to-hold, refi-to-sell, extend, or walk away
- Key risks with the recommended path
- Immediate next steps (what to do this week)
- Refi-to-hold vs. refi-to-sell product guidance: fixed vs. floating, long vs. short term, defeasance vs. YM
- "Do nothing" maturity scenario: default consequences, guaranty exposure, credit impact
- Rational default analysis (for non-recourse, underwater properties): the non-recourse put option has quantifiable value
Output Format
Present results in this order:
- Current Loan Status -- origination vs. current metrics with threshold flags
- Refinance Sizing -- constraint-by-constraint max proceeds with binding constraint
- Gap Analysis -- existing balance vs. new proceeds
- DSCR Sensitivity -- rate sensitivity grid with negative leverage flag
- Prepayment Cost Comparison -- YM vs. defeasance vs. open window with NPV
- Lender Comparison -- side-by-side matrix with weighted scoring (if quotes provided)
- Gap-Funding Scenarios -- five alternatives with feasibility and return impact
- Extension Test -- condition-by-condition pass/fail with cost to cure
- Stress Test -- base, downside, severe scenarios
- Decision Timeline -- milestones with deadlines and buffers
- Recommendation -- strategy with rationale and next steps
Red Flags & Failure Modes
- Using origination-vintage appraisals: A 2021 appraisal at a 4.5% cap is not the current value. Force current market values for the gap analysis to be meaningful.
- Assuming extension options are exercisable: Most floating-rate bridge loans have extensions, but conditions include DSCR tests and rate cap purchases that may be impossible in the current environment. Test the conditions, not just the existence.
- Ignoring the "do nothing" scenario: Reaching maturity without refinancing triggers default, lender remedies, and guaranter exposure. Quantify this as the baseline to compare against.
- Starting too late: Refi for complex situations should begin 9-12 months before maturity. The decision timeline must enforce this lead time.
- Single-point rate forecast: Rate sensitivity should show a range. The difference between 6.5% and 8.5% can be the difference between a healthy refi and a cash-in event.
- Ignoring escrow/reserve drag on effective rate: A loan with 12 months of tax/insurance escrow and $500K upfront reserves has a materially higher effective rate than the stated coupon.
Chain Notes
- Upstream: loan-sizing-engine (sizing methodology for new proceeds), debt-portfolio-monitor (maturity flagging)
- Downstream: mezz-pref-structurer (gap-funding via subordinate capital), capital-stack-optimizer (capital stack reconfiguration), workout-playbook (if refi is infeasible)
- Peer: deal-underwriting-assistant (rate sensitivity methodology shared)